Airlines
Eight year old Singapore Suites remains strong first class contender
The best part of a decade on from its October 2007 introduction into service, Singapore Airlines’ Suites class still has it. Cashing in a stack of frequent flyer points to fly from LAX to Tokyo Narita, I was surprised by how well the product has stood up against an increasing amount — and pace — of competition.
The LAX lounge was very pleasant, the Kyo-kaiseki food was exquisite, the Dom Pérignon and Krug sparkled, an afternoon wine tasting on board was delightful, and the crew were truly excellent — but let’s talk hard product, because that’s how Singapore Airlines’ Suites on the A380 truly differs from first class on other aircraft.
When it debuted nearly a decade ago, the A380’s massive size posed problems for airports — how do we handle this enormous airliner, which requires at least two floors’ worth of jetways? — but the resulting facilities mean that, when three jetways are provided, first class often gets its own. In terms of a premium experience, being one of twelve people walking down what feels like your own personal jetway helps to set the scene for a memorable flight.
With no overhead bins, the space is airy and bright over the suite walls, and even with the doors closed and shades drawn the cabin never feels too dark. This is impressive industrial design, even eight years after introduction.
The doors and walls of the suite are notable: pull-down blinds made partly of a woven reed-style matting and partly of a textured artificial fabric separate passengers from the rest of the cabin. The softer materials also help to reduce the noise level in the cabin. Given the quietness of the downstairs main deck area on the A380, and the fact that there are only twelve passengers in the cabin, it’s a particular trick to dampen the sound of one or two voices or a few glasses clinking rather than the murmur of a larger cabin.
The inflight entertainment screen, however, was a let-down. I realise it’s eight years old, but the screen size has not kept up with expectations. My 13” laptop screen, placed on the table, gave a larger viewing surface compared with the 23” IFE screen, and the video quality of my laptop was markedly better despite not being a Retina display.
In a product where there is clearly very little chance of the screen coming into contact with a passenger during head impact criterion (HIC) tests, it’s surprising that the screen size has not been increased during mid-life upgrades. A key opportunity for the airline (and for the wider inflight entertainment industry) in this space is to ensure that first class IFE can be upgraded in a simple, probably modular, and certainly cost-effective way to whatever the next big technology is. A plug-and-play approach to first class entertainment screens — where HIC is less of a concern than in economy or even business — may well reap #PaxEx benefits.
I also found the half-dozen ads before each movie on the IFE system very disappointing. In terms of content I wanted to watch, however, the selection was decent, although the audio quality of the music on board (particularly the classical choices) was not. Old MP3s I ripped from classical CDs fifteen years ago sounded better over the noise-cancelling earphones.
At the end of the day — indeed, at the end of my flight — I found myself struck by just how impressed I was with what is really an eight year old hard product. Singapore Airlines is to be commended for its foresightful industrial design and the excellent passenger experience. It will be fascinating to see how the next generation of suites in Suites builds on this baseline.